Clicks vs. Fittings: A Comparative Study of Online and Offline Clothing Purchases
Keywords:
Purchase Decision Factors, E-commerce Shopping, Shopping Preferences, Clothing Retail, In-Store Shopping, Online Shopping, Consumer BehaviorAbstract
Introduction: The rapid expansion of e-commerce has transformed consumer purchasing patterns worldwide, yet traditional in-store shopping remains significant, particularly in emerging markets. This study explores consumer shopping behavior in Georgia by comparing preferences for online and in-store clothing purchases, with attention to demographic factors, perceived benefits and barriers, and the role of technology in shaping future trends. Methods: A quantitative research design was employed using structured questionnaires administered to 385 respondents, predominantly residing in Tbilisi. The survey captured data on shopping preferences, influencing factors, perceived challenges, and technology usage. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted to identify key determinants of online versus in-store shopping behavior and to examine demographic variations. Results: The findings indicate clear distinctions between online and in-store shoppers. Online consumers primarily value secure payment systems, ease of use, and broad product availability, especially regarding size, color, and style options. In contrast, in-store shoppers prioritize the ability to try on clothing, physically inspect products, and complete purchases immediately. Major barriers to online shopping include sizing issues (22%) and concerns about product quality (24%), while in-store shopping is mainly constrained by crowding (31%) and limited stock (26%). Despite increasing digitalization, 42% of respondents expect to continue shopping mainly in physical stores. Technology plays a significant role in shaping behavior, with higher mobile application usage observed among women. Traditional product discovery methods, such as window shopping and search engines, remain dominant, whereas social media exerts a comparatively limited influence. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that convenience is the primary driver of online clothing purchases, while tactile experience and immediacy motivate in-store shopping in Georgia. Although e-commerce continues to grow, physical retail remains resilient. These insights can support retailers and policymakers in designing hybrid strategies that integrate digital convenience with enhanced in-store experiences to better meet evolving consumer expectations.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Jensen, K. L., Yenerall, J., Chen, X., Yu, T. E. (2021). US consumers’ online shopping behaviors and intentions during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 53(3), 416-434. Retrieved from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-and-applied-economics/article/us-consumers-online-shopping-behaviors-and-intentions-during-and-after-the-covid19-pandemic/0A1344881438B4F2E68D134C827F74CF
Güven, M. (2025). Cognitive Dissonance Theory on Customer Behaviour. Arcadia. https://www.byarcadia.org/post/cognitive-dissonance-theory-on-customer-behaviour
Hochreiter, V., Benedetto, C., Loesch, M. (2023). Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development. Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 7-16. Available at: https://researchleap.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/01_The-Stimulus-Organism-Response-S-O-R-Paradigm-as-a-Guiding-Principle-in-Environmental-Psychology.pdf
McKimmie, B.M. (2017). Cognitive Dissonance Theory. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1121-1
Tueanrat, Y. Alamanos, E. (2025). Cognitive Dissonance Theory: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book. Available at https://open.ncl.ac.uk
Davis, F. D., Granić, A. (2024). The Technology Acceptance Model, pp. 19–57, 59–101.
Germany Apparel Consumer Insights – Who Shops, what do They Shop, How do They Shop and Why do They Shop. (2024). GlobalData report store, Retrieved from: https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/germany-apparel-consumer-trend-analysis/
Mamuladze, M. (2022). Economic Aspects of the Apparel Industry. Retrieved from: https://geoeconomics.ge/?p=14212 One-Stop Solution for Textile – Apparel – Fashion Industry. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/
Mintel G. (2023). Online vs. Offline Retail: The Indian Consumer. Retrieved from: https://clients.mintel.com/download/brochure/market-research-report-brochure-india-online-vs-offline-retail-indian-consumer-2023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Articles published in the Health Policy, Economics and Sociology are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. You are free to share and adapt the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.
ჟურნალი უზრუნველყოფს დაუყოვნებელ ღია წვდომას მის შინაარსზე იმ პრინციპით, რომ კვლევის შედეგების საჯაროდ ხელმისაწვდომობა ხელს უწყობს ცოდნის გლობალურ გაცვლას.
ჟურნალში გამოქვეყნებული სტატიები ვრცელდება Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) ლიცენზიით. თქვენ უფლება გაქვთ გაავრცელოთ ან გამოიყენოთ მასალა ნებისმიერი (მათ შორის კომერციული) მიზნით, იმ პირობით, რომ მიუთითებთ ავტორ(ებ)ს და პირველწყაროს.








