The importance of consistent health communication for the successful implementation of vaccination programs
Keywords:
ethics, public health, conspiracy theories, disinformation, vaccination, Health communicationAbstract
Introduction: Vaccination is one of the most successful public health interventions of the past two centuries, having saved millions of lives and significantly reduced the burden of infectious diseases, both economically and in terms of health and mortality. Despite its proven effectiveness, negative public attitudes toward vaccination have periodically emerged and intensified over time. This phenomenon is reflected in the creation and spread of disinformation and conspiracy theories, often fueled by inconsistent communication campaigns from health authorities. The COVID-19 pandemic marked a major turning point, clearly demonstrating the dangers that arise when the public receives contradictory messages and ambiguous information. Such inconsistency undermines trust, fosters skepticism, and hampers the successful implementation of immunization programs, thereby reducing coverage rates. Against this backdrop, consistent, transparent, and evidence-based health communication has become one of the main pillars of global public health protection. This study aims to examine and evaluate the importance of consistency in health communication for the effective implementation of vaccination programs, analyze the theoretical foundations of health communication, explore global experiences, and assess the principles of strategic communication in combating disinformation. It also seeks to identify key factors that determine the credibility of communication and the degree of public trust. Methods: Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative approach and a systematic review of the literature. The analysis draws upon reports from the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, OECD, and Gavi, as well as authoritative scientific publications from 2015 to 2025. Selection criteria included modernity, relevance, and scientific credibility. Content analysis of the literature revealed key trends, including the impact of communication consistency on trust, the psychological mechanisms underlying disinformation, the social origins of conspiracy theories, and the ethical considerations in health communication. Results: The findings demonstrate that consistent communication is essential for maintaining public trust, promoting behavioral change, and enhancing resilience to disinformation. Unified and coordinated messaging—across levels from international organizations to local health personnel - promotes public awareness and adherence to vaccination programs. This is evidenced by the cases of New Zealand, Finland, and Rwanda, where coordinated communication strategies contributed significantly to vaccination success. Conclusion: The study concludes that consistency in health communication is not merely a technical matter but an ethical and moral imperative. The core principles of public health ethics—autonomy, fairness, and non-maleficence—require that all individuals receive equally reliable, consistent, and comprehensible information, which is essential for informed decision-making. Consistency also represents a form of democratic accountability, as transparent communication strengthens public engagement. Ultimately, the success of immunization programs depends substantially on consistent health communication, which should be regarded as a strategic investment ensuring the sustainability of immunization, the strengthening of social cohesion, and the effectiveness of life-saving health interventions.
References
1. Betsch, C., Böhm, R., Korn, L., & Holtmann, C. (2020). On the benefits of explaining herd immunity in vaccine advocacy. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 372–379.
2. Burki, T. (2021). Vaccine misinformation and social media. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(5), e219–e220.
3. Childress. J.E., Faden. R.R., Gaare. R.D., Gos M.L., Kahn. J., Bonni, R.J., Kass, N.E., Mastroianni. A.C., Moreno, J.D., Nieburg, P. (2002). Public health ethics: Mapping the terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(2), 170–178.
4. Cinelli. M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C.M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A.L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 16598.
5. Douglas, K.M., Uscinski, J.E., Sutton, R.M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Chee Siang Ang., Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35.
6. Dubé. E., Ward, J.K., Verger, P., MacDonald, N.E. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy: An overview. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 17(5), 1599–1609.
7. Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance. (2022). Rwanda’s success in vaccination campaigns.
8. Hornsey, M.J., Harris, E.A., Fielding, K.S. (2021). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes. PNAS, 118(25), e2106445118.
9. Jegede, A.S. (2007). What led to the Nigerian boycott of the polio vaccination campaign? PLoS Medicine, 4(3), e73.
10. Kalke, K., Studd, H., Scherr, C.L. (2021). Communicating uncertainty in public health. Health Communication, 36(1), 10–18.
11. Larson, H.J., Clarke, R.M., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Levine, Z., Schulz, W.S., Paterson, P. (2018). Measuring trust in vaccination: A global perspective. The Lancet, 392(10161), 2244–2256.
12. Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Ecker, U.K.H. (2021). The Debunking Handbook 2020. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0259050.
13. OECD. (2022). Trust and public communication in times of crisis. OECD Publishing.
14. Oketch, S.Y., Ochomo, E.O., Orwa, J.A., Mayieka, L.M., Abdullahi, L.H. (2023). Communication strategies to improve human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization uptake among adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ Open
15. Opel, D.J., Salmon, D.A., Marcuse, E.K. (2020). Building trust and confidence in COVID-19 vaccines. JAMA, 324(23), 2215–2216.
16. Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402.
17. Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G. (2018). Cognitive reflection and the evaluation of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880.
18. van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897–908.
19. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.
20. WHO. (2020). Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. World Health Organization.
21. WHO. (2021b). Risk communication and community engagement during health emergencies: Interim guidance.
22. WHO. (2022). EARS: Early AI-supported response system.
23. WHO. (2023a). Immunization Agenda 2030: A global strategy to leave no one behind. World Health Organization.
24. WHO. (2023b). WHO partners with digital platforms to counter misinformation.
