Mikheil Muskhelishvili’s Federalist Vision and the British European Dilemma: From the Idea of a Federal Europe to Brexit

Authors

  • Lela Saralidze Institute for Regional Studies

Keywords:

Brexit, British sovereignty, European integration, Michel Mouskhely, European federalism

Abstract

Introduction: This article examines the federalist thought of the Georgian scholar and international law specialist Mikheil Muskhelishvili (Michel Mouskhely; 1903–1964) within the broader history of European integration and the United Kingdom’s evolving relationship with the European project. Particular attention is given to Muskhelishvili’s concept of non-dogmatic federalism and to the enduring tension between European political integration, national sovereignty, and political autonomy. Methods: The study employs historical-comparative and intellectual-historical approaches. It analyses Muskhelishvili’s theoretical writings on federalism, the 1948 Project for a European Constitution prepared jointly with Gaston Stefani, relevant historical documents, and scholarly literature on European integration and British European policy. The analysis compares Muskhelishvili’s conception of the distribution of competences between common institutions and constituent states with the historical development of the United Kingdom’s position toward European integration. Results: The analysis shows that Muskhelishvili understood federalism as a legal and institutional system for distributing political authority among different levels of governance rather than as a mechanism for abolishing constituent states. The 1948 constitutional project translated this principle into a concrete framework designed to reconcile European political unity with national political autonomy. The British experience followed a different trajectory, in which parliamentary sovereignty and national political control remained persistent concerns despite participation in European integration. Brexit brought this long-standing tension between supranational integration and national sovereignty into particularly clear focus. Conclusion: Muskhelishvili’s federalist thought provides a valuable analytical framework for understanding one of the central problems of European integration: how common political authority can be strengthened while preserving the political autonomy of constituent states. From this perspective, Brexit can be interpreted as part of a longer historical tension between European integration and national sovereignty rather than solely as the consequence of contemporary political circumstances.

References

Butler, G., Jensen, M. D., & Snaith, H. (2016). Slow change may pull us apart: Debating a British exit from the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1278–1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1174527

Dinan, D. (2014). Europe recast: A history of European Union (2nd ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Electoral Commission. (2016). EU referendum results.

European Commission. (2020). The EU–UK Withdrawal Agreement.

European Communities. (1972). Treaty concerning the accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the European Economic Community and to the European Atomic Energy Community. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 73, 5–204.

European Union. (2017). Notification by the United Kingdom under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.

Gordon, M. (2016). Brexit: A challenge for the UK constitution, of the UK constitution? European Constitutional Law Review, 12(3), 409–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019616000341

Haas, E. B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford University Press.

Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785

Lipgens, W., & Loth, W. (Eds.). (1988). Documents on the history of European integration: Vol. 3. The struggle for European union by political parties and pressure groups in Western European countries, 1945–1950. Walter de Gruyter.

McCormick, J. (2020). Understanding the European Union: A concise introduction (8th ed.). Red Globe Press.

Menon, A., & Salter, J.-P. (2016). Brexit: Initial reflections. International Affairs, 92(6), 1297–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12745

Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell University Press.

Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European integration. Palgrave Macmillan.

Saralidze, L. (2026). Mikheil Muskhelishvili (Michel Mouskhely) at the beginnings of European federalism. Favorite Style.

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

Saralidze , L. (2026). Mikheil Muskhelishvili’s Federalist Vision and the British European Dilemma: From the Idea of a Federal Europe to Brexit. Health Policy, Economics and Sociology, 10((დამატება / Supplement). Retrieved from https://heconomic.cu.edu.ge/index.php/healthecosoc/article/view/12218

Similar Articles

Showing 1-10 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.